Opening up: for who?
At the cross roads
A statement of concern
From periphery to center

From Periphery to Centre: Need for Collective
(Haribabu, (1995), ANLetter, Vol. 4 Issue 2, November) Each dawn brings to us a new 'development' project. And with each new project a community looses its livelihood and identity. Their occupation is no more what they have been practising traditionally. Their land is no more traceable in the name it had been known for ages. Nor is the community traceable for they are not left behind to enjoy the ‘fruits of this new development’.

  • World Bank - IMF led structural adjustment and liberalisation in India and the promotion of tourism as part of an integrated economic agenda, heralded by the 'New Economic Policy', especially the implications of the recent General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS);
  • the evolution of tourism in India from its early 'cultural tourism' days to aggressive development today: Special Tourism Areas, privatisation of tourism infrastructure, luxury hotels, proliferation of domestic airlines, open skies policy allowing charter flights to cater to 'mass tourism', golf resorts wooing up-market Japanese and European tourists, multinational and multilateral interests in Indian tourism, opening up of hitherto 'restless areas' in the Northeast;
  • unresolved questions of land alienation in India, within the context of large-scale conversion and acquisition of revenue and agricultural land for hotels golf courses resorts; the ecological implications of tourism in coastal areas (water sports), high mountain ranges (skiing, winter sports), off- road and Himalayan car rallies sponsored by multinational companies, uncontrolled release of solid waste into the natural environment, inadequate enforcement of sewage treatment requirements by hotels and its effect on local health and drinking water sources;
  • the destruction off flora and fauna in wildlife and so-called ecotourism, the relationship between sanctuaries and adivasis, the inequal distribution of economic benefits;
  • the commodification and museumisation of cultural heritage - art, artefacts, architecture - and cultural forms - music, dance, related local traditions as tourist attractions (all in the name of 'heritage tourism' and 'showcasing’ India);
  • the reality of 'international understanding' at the level of the petty trader, the hawker, the women and children who prostitute themselves, and other informal sector 'hangers-on' of the tourist economy;
  • drug-peddling, trade of women and children as commercial sex workers, and their growing link with international tourism.

As such, the challenge to concerned people and groups, including ourselves, is undoubtedly to continue with and push forward efforts that:

  • support local struggles and movements against destructive five- star tourism in destinations, other than those that are in any way communal, sectarian or exclusivist.
  • raise at various forums and in various ways fundamental questions about tourism such as: who benefits and who profits from, who pays for, and who loses, because of tourism development?
  • and, arising from this evolve conscious holistic policies as alternatives to the existing models and practices, working with like-minded people towards these objectives.

Towards a critique: Some Statements
In the context of neo-colonisation

  • tourism has to be viewed in the context of a development model which has a political character;
  • tourism development has taken place along with increased elitism, authoritarianism, militarism and various forms of State repression in different parts of the world: all of these are threats to the culture, economy and empowerment of communities;
  • tourism development along with the globalisation process threatens the sovereignty of a nation (in the broadest definition of 'nation);
  • tourism eulogises a certain consumptive and luxurious lifestyle which is unsustainable by any means;
  • tourism as a harbinger of goodwill amongst people is a false propaganda;
  • tourism promotes net outflow of capital to the global market economy, especially to the so-called developed nations, tourism promotes net flow of capital to affluent sections internally;
  • the tourism economy promotes the conversion of drugs to cash linked to the arms trade and,
  • tourism is based on the objectified view of the world where beaches, sanctuaries and so on are seen as objects of pleasure which negates the sanctity of the objects as well as of possible meaningful relationships between peoples and their environments.

We welcome a wider discussion, and your comments and analysis would be useful in further sharpening the discourse on tourism in the context of development.