Login
Myriad Faces Of Tourism  |
| September 04, 2010 |
 |
| With diverse experiences and research in sustainable tourism, EQUATIONS has the wherewithal to justifiably turn into an advisory... |
| The Equal and Opposite Effect |
| August 30, 2010 |
 |
| We have never before witnessed such a huge multi-billion rupee racket as the Commonwealth Games in... |
| State tourism policy scrutinized by various concerned organizations |
| August 29, 2010 |
 |
| The second and the final day of the Regional Consultation on Responsible Tourism in the North Eastern States of... |
| NE Tourism conference has an eye for future prospects |
| August 26, 2010 |
 |
| A two-day regional consultation on responsible tourism in the North Eastern states of India kicked off this... |
| NE tourism stakeholders to brainstorm at Gangtok for responsible tourism code |
| August 25, 2010 |
 |
| A two day regional consultation on ‘responsible tourism’ in the North-eastern region of India organized by... |
NGO expresses concern over tourism Bill
July 12, 2010
Click here to download 'NGO expresses concern over tourism Bill-12 July 2010-The Hindu', 56Kb. The same can be read below too.
NGO expresses concern over tourism Bill
12 July 2010
Equations, a research, campaigning and advocacy organisation, has expressed concern over the Kerala Tourism (Conservation & Preservation of Areas) Amendment Bill 2010 on the grounds that it will usurp the powers and mandate of local self-governing institutions.
In a letter to Governor R.S. Gavai, Chief Minister V.S. Achuthanandan and Subject Committee members that was released here on Saturday, the Bangalore-based non-governmental organisation (NGO) said the development authorities that had been proposed to replace the tourism committees in the Bill clearly bypassed the constitutional mandate and the provisions of the Kerala Panchayati Raj Act 1994.
It was pointed out that Article 243 G and Article 243 W of the Constitution delegate the responsibility with respect to preparation of plans for economic development and social justice and implementation of schemes for the purpose to the local bodies.
The tourism industry relied on natural resources and services that fall under the jurisdiction of panchayats. Hence, it was important that the local panchayats and municipalities were involved in regulating tourism developments at the local level. Transferring this regulatory role to a parastatal body implied loss of democratic exercise of powers by the local bodies, the NGO said in the letter.
It said the constitution of the development authorities would lead to substitution of the general planning process in favour of tourism-related development.
According to the Bill, the State Tourism Development Authority will have the right to modify the development plans of the regions that are declared Special Tourism Zones.
Equations said tourism development should only be a subset of the general planning processes. The master plan of any area had the mandate of overall development of the area and tourism should not dictate the development process, it said.
Kerala Vision Document 2025, developed by the State Tourism Department, specifically acknowledged that the participation of local self-government institutions and NGOs were necessary for tourism development. The Kerala Tourism Act 2005 and the Kerala Tourism Ordinance and the Kerala Tourism Amendment Bill 2010 undermined these principles of public participation in tourism development, it was pointed out.
In a letter to Governor R.S. Gavai, Chief Minister V.S. Achuthanandan and Subject Committee members that was released here on Saturday, the Bangalore-based non-governmental organisation (NGO) said the development authorities that had been proposed to replace the tourism committees in the Bill clearly bypassed the constitutional mandate and the provisions of the Kerala Panchayati Raj Act 1994.
It was pointed out that Article 243 G and Article 243 W of the Constitution delegate the responsibility with respect to preparation of plans for economic development and social justice and implementation of schemes for the purpose to the local bodies.
The tourism industry relied on natural resources and services that fall under the jurisdiction of panchayats. Hence, it was important that the local panchayats and municipalities were involved in regulating tourism developments at the local level. Transferring this regulatory role to a parastatal body implied loss of democratic exercise of powers by the local bodies, the NGO said in the letter.
It said the constitution of the development authorities would lead to substitution of the general planning process in favour of tourism-related development.
According to the Bill, the State Tourism Development Authority will have the right to modify the development plans of the regions that are declared Special Tourism Zones.
Equations said tourism development should only be a subset of the general planning processes. The master plan of any area had the mandate of overall development of the area and tourism should not dictate the development process, it said.
Kerala Vision Document 2025, developed by the State Tourism Department, specifically acknowledged that the participation of local self-government institutions and NGOs were necessary for tourism development. The Kerala Tourism Act 2005 and the Kerala Tourism Ordinance and the Kerala Tourism Amendment Bill 2010 undermined these principles of public participation in tourism development, it was pointed out.